Choosing a handgun, especially for self-defense, is a deeply personal decision. The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 and the Glock 17 are two of the most popular handguns on the market, both lauded for their reliability and performance. This detailed comparison will help you decide which pistol best suits your needs, whether you're a seasoned shooter or a first-time buyer.
Key Differences: A Quick Overview
Before diving deep, let's highlight the core differences between these two iconic firearms:
| Feature | Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 | Glock 17 |
|---|---|---|
| Size/Weight | Slightly smaller & lighter | Slightly larger & heavier |
| Grip Texture | Aggressive, textured grip | Stippled, less aggressive |
| Trigger | Slightly lighter, more crisp | Slightly heavier, more consistent |
| Ambidextrous Features | Ambidextrous slide release, magazine release | Ambidextrous slide release (optional) |
| Price | Generally more affordable in the same condition | Generally more expensive in the same condition |
Detailed Comparison: Performance and Features
Now, let's analyze each aspect more closely:
1. Ergonomics and Feel
The M&P 2.0 boasts a more aggressive grip texture, offering excellent control even with sweaty hands. Its slightly smaller frame fits a wider range of hand sizes comfortably. The trigger is generally considered crisper and lighter, which some shooters prefer for faster target acquisition.
The Glock 17, known for its rugged simplicity, features a stippled grip that provides a secure hold. While the stippling is less aggressive than the M&P 2.0, it's still effective. The Glock's trigger is known for its consistent pull, though it's typically heavier than the M&P 2.0. This can be a benefit for those prioritizing safety and preventing accidental discharges.
2. Reliability and Durability
Both pistols are renowned for their reliability. Both the M&P 2.0 and Glock 17 have proven themselves capable of handling thousands of rounds with minimal maintenance. They are often chosen by law enforcement and military personnel due to their dependable performance under stress.
3. Features and Customization
The M&P 2.0 offers ambidextrous slide releases and magazine releases, catering to both right-handed and left-handed shooters. Its accessory rail allows for mounting lights or lasers.
The Glock 17 also has an accessory rail but requires aftermarket parts for ambidextrous controls. While customization options exist, they often increase the overall cost compared to the M&P 2.0.
4. Concealed Carry Considerations
The M&P 2.0's slightly smaller size and lighter weight generally make it more suitable for concealed carry, though this depends significantly on individual body types and preferred carry methods.
The Glock 17, being larger and heavier, might prove less comfortable for concealed carry, but it may still be manageable depending on the holster and the carrier's build.
5. Ammunition Capacity
Both pistols generally come with high-capacity magazines. The standard magazine capacity for both often varies by state and local laws. Always check local regulations before purchasing.
Conclusion: Choosing the Right Pistol
Ultimately, the "better" pistol depends on your individual preferences and needs. The M&P 2.0 offers a more comfortable grip, a lighter trigger, and ambidextrous controls at a generally lower price point. The Glock 17 prioritizes reliability, a consistent trigger pull, and a robust build, although it comes at a higher initial cost.
Consider handling both pistols if possible before making a purchase. Rentals at a shooting range are a great way to get a feel for each gun's ergonomics and trigger. Consult with experienced shooters and firearm instructors to gather more informed opinions based on your specific requirements. Remember that responsible gun ownership includes understanding your local laws and regulations, safe handling practices, and ongoing training.
